Monday, June 25, 2012

The Puritans



The Puritans

1)      What is the difference between natural liberty and civil liberty? Why does Winthrop believe civil liberty is better?

Natural liberty is the freedom to do whatever one pleases without concern towards anyone but themselves.  There is no maximum limit on their conscious form; man can perform good or evil without recourse.  John Winthrop stated this form of liberty, “…makes men grow more evil and in time to be worse than brute beasts.”, whereas, civil liberty is concerned with the well being of the community and those within it to attain its highest potential.


2) How effective is Williams' argument for the separation of church and state? Does the separation of the two sever the bond that sustains the community as Winthrop believed? If so what could be a substitute for religion?

Roger Williams’ reflection on the separation of church and state has had a effective result in American History as it’s not practiced in today’s government.  John Winthrop upheld that people incorporate God in every aspect of their life, that there can be no separation between church and state.  He ascertained that one complimented another, the church rewards, the state punishes and vice versa both working hand in hand to provide the optimal state.  The separation of both, according to Williams would still maintain an optimal state without the church influence, providing for a free religious society to this day have been utilized in the United States.  What could substitute for religion (church) to work with state is the law.  Irrevocably, without laws to maintain government, state will fall.


3) What aspects of the Christian religion make it democratic?

An aspect of the Christian religion that makes it democratic is the belief in the rights for individuals.  Christian followers look up to God, an unseen individual who extols what is “right” or “wrong” and delivers punishment and rewards, the same can be said for a democratic state.


Interpretation

      “…Magistrates sin grievously against the work of God and blood of souls by such proceedings.”

      I interpret this quote as when state and religion is utilized together the way it is interpreted by government officials is not what God’s word intended it to be.  To be used to employ harsh punishment based on religious narrowing.
 

Work Cited

Williams, Roger  The Bloody Tenet of Persecution for Caused of Conscience (1644)

No comments:

Post a Comment