Questions
1)
How does Carnegie adapt the theory of
social Darwinism into his own writings on the accumulation of wealth?
Carnegie integrates social Darwinism in his writing, but stating
those who are able (independently) to acquire wealth is more proficient than
those lesser beings who need help (also called the survival of the fittest),
but it is up to the fittest to help the weak.
2)
How would you evaluate social Darwinism
in regards to Lloyd's writings on socialism?
Lloyd was against social Darwinism in respect that those who
were poor needed help the most instead of forgetting about them. Given opportunity they will succeed.
Interpretation
Carnegie
Wealth (1889)
“Thus is the problem of Rich and Poor to be solved. The laws of accumulation will be left free;
the laws of distribution free.
Individualism will continue, but the millionaire will be but a trustee
for the poor; intrusted for a season with a great part of the increased wealth
of the community far better than it could or would have done for itself”.
I chose this passage as a reflection of the way Carnegie
thought. He believed that the wealthy
had an obligation to the poor by way of being thy brother’s keeper. He believed that the poor, or less ambitious,
were unable to do for themselves so it is up to the more fortunate to help the
community excel.
No comments:
Post a Comment